I Think Qwen 3.6 Plus Has Strong Coding Capabilities, But My Costs Are Higher Than Expected

I compared two approaches: 1、Using Qwen 3.6 Plus to write large-scale C# programs, then having DeepSeek v4 Pro conduct code reviews; 2、Using DeepSeek v4 Pro to write large-scale C# programs, then having Qwen 3.6 Plus conduct code reviews.

I prefer the second approach for these reasons: 1、DeepSeek v4 Pro supports a context length of up to 1 million tokens. For large projects, this helps maintain clear logical connections between modules. Additionally, DeepSeek v4 Pro is currently more affordable (until May 31, 2026, it’s offered at 25% of the regular price—see screenshots in my previous blog). 2、Qwen 3.6 Plus delivers higher code quality but at a higher cost. Using it only for code reviews helps reduce overall expenses.

Below is a partial cost breakdown from my usage of Qwen 3.6 Plus. It might look cheap at first glance: one entry shows 876K tokens costing 1.7 RMB (≈ $0.24). But in practice, completing a single large engineering task often costs 30 RMB (≈ $4.00). The credits I top up on Alibaba Cloud deplete much faster with Qwen than with DeepSeek.

图1

Another important note: Alibaba grants new users 1 million free tokens for many models, as shown below.

But is 1 million tokens truly generous? From my hands-on coding experience: 1 million tokens only cover 1–3 large programming tasks or several code reviews. For heavy AI-assisted coding users, 1 million tokens feel like a 100ml beer—barely a sip. 图1

So, if an article boasts about “burning 100 million tokens,” it likely reflects limited real-world AI coding experience.

To wrap up, I’d like to acknowledge: 1、ByteDance’s TRAE IDE for its innovation; 2、DeepSeek v4 Pro for its generous long-context support and current affordability (I’ll share updated billing data in June); 3、Qwen 3.6 Plus for its strong coding capabilities and responsive API.

In upcoming blogs, I’ll detail how to leverage AI coding within TRAE.

About Me

I’ve worked at NetEase Games, Baidu, Tencent (8 years), and Meituan (nearly 7 years), leading large R&D projects and managing teams of over 100 engineers.

Now I build software as an independent developer.

Why? Because the world is full of uncertainty—staying at one company too long can make you addicted to certainty. Building on your own is like sailing into uncharted waters.

I believe good software should give people a sense of security and control. That’s the thread connecting everything I make:

  • PhotoRestore Pro — AI photo restoration that runs 100% offline on Windows. Your photos never leave your device. No cloud, no account, no compromise on privacy. Built for legal professionals, but anyone with old family photos will find it useful.

  • AstroSky — Think of it as “Snapseed for astronomy.” Turn raw FITS data into stunning celestial images. Fully offline, GPU-accelerated, with a Beauty/Science dual mode that serves both casual stargazers and researchers.

  • fastool.io — A collection of browser-based science tools. Right now it’s focused on astronomy: solar path tracking, moon phase analysis, sidereal time calculation, telescope FOV planning—all running in your browser with zero data upload.

Whether I’m gazing at the cosmos or refining a line of code, the goal is the same: build tools that put people in control of their own data.

Get in touch: HummingbirdLabs@outlook.com.